Where does it say that legal websites have to be dull, stuffy and grey?

leading cases

 ::  Tam Mei Kam v HSBC International Trustee Limited (16 June 2008): “Mui Yim-fong ( 梅艷芳), also known as Anita Mui, needs no introduction in Hong Kong.”

 ::  Mosley v News Group Newspapers Limited (9 April 2008): “The objective can be achieved effectively without displaying the edited footage of bottoms being spanked”

 ::  Howell v Millais (4 July 2007): “There is no disguising the regrettable features of this case.”

 ::  Society for the Protection of Harbour v Secretary for Justice (20 March 2008): “[The Hong Kong harbour] is an asset so central to Hong Kong's identity that it is afforded a special protection”. In a concise, delightful and well balanced judgement, Hartmann J explained the issues relating to one of Hong Kong's most important assets.

 ::  Joshua Ong v Malaysian Airline System Bhd (18 March 2008): In a parent's worst nightmare, a 13-year old 'unaccompanied minor' travelled from Kuala Lumpur to Hong Kong on one of the respondent's aircrafts and suffered serious head injury when he fainted and fell as he walked up the immigration counter. The Hong Kong Court of Appeal had to decide, among other things, whether he was 'in the course of…embarking and disembarking' within the meaning of Article 17 of the Amended Warsaw Convention.

 :: Tang v Tang [2008] HKCA: In an interesting case where the surname of all parties (3 plaintiffs and 4 defendants) and the judge who deliver the main judgement are “Tang”, the Hong Kong court of appeal had to decide a case involving the distribution of assets belonging to an “ancestral tong”…

 :: Hong Kong Court of Appeal allowed appeal of China second largest insurer, Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (中國平安保險(集團)股份有限公司) (the “respondent”) in relation to it trademarks “Ping An” and “平安” (11 January 2008).